SOL-wPONDon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $59.52K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $31.42K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- HdM9481g…f4P2 · observed 2026-09-06
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 55/100 gives this pool a Hold verdict of HOLD, with Enter at 49/100, Hold at 61/100, and Exit at 20/100. Its #134-of-4410 rank among raydium-clmm pools places it above most listed pools, but the score does not mean the position is low risk: the verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the fee-only structure remains sensitive to trading activity in a small MEMECOIN pool. A TVL drain, sustained volume decline, collapse in 187.9%, or evidence that price movement is producing material impermanent loss would weaken the assessment; persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-06 18:24 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$59.52K
Total value locked
$31.42K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 239.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current SOL/WPOND price and set the position for review as soon as either boundary is reached; do not wait for the position to remain one-sided. Exit or narrow exposure if fee generation falls materially below the current 187.9% while the pool's activity also weakens from the 0.53x baseline.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 187.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $31.42K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $314.25 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 7 SOL-wPOND pools
by AI Farmer Score
#146 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1119 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-wPOND liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WPOND into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount and the value of your holdings can fall if WPOND or SOL moves sharply or if trading activity declines.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported Total APR of 500.0% consists of 187.9% from trading fees and 312.1% from rewards. 38% of the yield is therefore fee-funded. No active reward contribution is reflected, and the status of any future reward schedule is not established; the fee APR should be treated as variable because it depends on volume, liquidity, and the share of fees captured by this position.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range history is also not available, so realized price divergence and range efficiency cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-WPOND carries large directional and liquidity risks: WPOND repricing can move the position toward one asset, while lower activity can reduce fee income. Any future emissions may decay, and exit timing matters because waiting for incentives to decline can leave fee income insufficient to offset price divergence or withdrawal slippage.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against WPOND and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than a typical memecoin. SOL price movement changes the pool's relative price and can push a concentrated-liquidity position out of range, while sharp SOL moves can create impermanent loss even if WPOND's nominal price is unchanged. SOL's broader liquidity can support execution, but it does not remove the pool-specific risks created by WPOND.
tollwPOND Context
WPOND is the memecoin side of this pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this market and related venues than SOL's. A WPOND rally or decline relative to SOL changes the required asset mix in the position and can leave the LP holding more of the underperforming asset. Thin external liquidity or abrupt WPOND repricing can also make rebalancing and exit execution more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WPOND into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount and the value of your holdings can fall if WPOND or SOL moves sharply or if trading activity declines.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HdM9481g5mXApUUsMSMxwVcRVcTde7nqLjGsgqMMf4P2
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- wPOND (3JgFwoYV…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 312.1%, so the reported 500.0% is generated by 187.9% in trading fees rather than active emissions. If incentives are added later and then decay, that portion of APR would fall unless fee volume increases enough to compensate.
The current reward component is 312.1%, so the reported 500.0% is generated by 187.9% in trading fees rather than active emissions. If incentives are added later and then decay, that portion of APR would fall unless fee volume increases enough to compensate.
There is currently no reported reward contribution, so expiration would not directly reduce the present 312.1% component below its current level. The remaining return would depend on 187.9%, and weaker liquidity or trading after an incentive change could reduce fee income and make exit execution harder.
There is currently no reported reward contribution, so expiration would not directly reduce the present 312.1% component below its current level. The remaining return would depend on 187.9%, and weaker liquidity or trading after an incentive change could reduce fee income and make exit execution harder.
Risk is high because WPOND can move sharply relative to SOL, creating impermanent loss and potentially concentrating the position in the weaker asset. The pool also has $60K of liquidity and a 0.53x volume-to-TVL ratio, so fees depend on continued activity in a relatively small market.
Risk is high because WPOND can move sharply relative to SOL, creating impermanent loss and potentially concentrating the position in the weaker asset. The pool also has $60K of liquidity and a 0.53x volume-to-TVL ratio, so fees depend on continued activity in a relatively small market.
Consider exiting when the position reaches a range boundary, when fee income falls materially below 187.9%, or when liquidity and activity deteriorate from $60K and 0.53x. Exiting before a prolonged WPOND repricing or after incentives weaken can limit further one-sided exposure.
Consider exiting when the position reaches a range boundary, when fee income falls materially below 187.9%, or when liquidity and activity deteriorate from $60K and 0.53x. Exiting before a prolonged WPOND repricing or after incentives weaken can limit further one-sided exposure.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The position would need accumulated fees near 187.9% to offset its realized price divergence, and that pace can slow materially if the current 0.53x declines.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The position would need accumulated fees near 187.9% to offset its realized price divergence, and that pace can slow materially if the current 0.53x declines.
