SOL-Mogon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $44.43K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $42.33K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.60% fee
- Pool address
- Hk3P7DvF…N7tq · observed 2026-10-28
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 53/100 places this pool below a neutral hold threshold, while Enter, Hold, and Exit scores of 47/100, 59/100, and 22/100 produce a live HOLD verdict from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1696 among 9963 raydium-clmm pools indicates a middling position in the screened universe, not a strong pool-specific edge. The assessment would improve with sustained volume relative to TVL, deeper liquidity, or a durable increase in fee APR; it would worsen with a TVL drain, fee-yield collapse, persistent out-of-range positioning, or an incentive schedule that decays without compensating trading activity.
Computed 2026-10-28 20:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$44.43K
Total value locked
$42.33K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 208.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a narrow range centered on the current SOL/MOG price, monitor whether the position remains in range, and rebalance or exit when it moves out of range and fee generation no longer offsets the cost and exposure of repositioning.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 208.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $42.33K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $253.97 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-Mog pools
by AI Farmer Score
#171 of 19676 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1397 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Mog liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MOG into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and the pool's reported return depends on actual trading activity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-MOG decomposes into 208.0% from trading fees and 292.0% from rewards, with 42% of yield sustained by fees. Reward dependency and the pool's emission schedule are not confirmed, so any future reward component should be treated as uncertain rather than as a durable return source. For this memecoin pool, exit timing matters if emissions are introduced and then decay, because the fee component would remain the primary observable basis for APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not currently available, so recent loss from price divergence and the share of time the position stayed active cannot be quantified. SOL-MOG belongs to the MEMECOIN pool family: MOG-specific price shocks, thin liquidity, and rapid sentiment changes can create large rebalancing needs and adverse selection. Emission decay is an additional risk if incentives are later added; an LP should not wait for a nominal reward schedule to compensate for deteriorating liquidity or a worsening exit market.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, widely traded asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than MOG. For this LP, a sharp SOL move relative to MOG changes the pool price and can push a concentrated position out of range, while sustained divergence can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset.
tollMog Context
MOG is the memecoin leg, with liquidity and price discovery more concentrated than SOL's across the wider Solana market. A rapid MOG repricing can generate fees but can also create adverse selection and inventory imbalance, especially when the pool's recent trading activity is modest relative to its liquidity.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MOG into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and the pool's reported return depends on actual trading activity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Hk3P7DvFnKCBoD6Q2vy9keHVePKQVJEsFQVybje7N7tq
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Mog (26VfKb7j…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is divided between 208.0% in fees and 292.0% in rewards, with 42% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the reward portion can fall while the fee portion depends on trading volume rather than the incentive schedule.
The current return is divided between 208.0% in fees and 292.0% in rewards, with 42% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the reward portion can fall while the fee portion depends on trading volume rather than the incentive schedule.
The reward component would decline or disappear, leaving the fee component of 208.0% as the main measurable return source. Because reward dependency and the pool lifecycle are not confirmed, an LP should assess whether trading fees alone justify remaining in the position before incentives end.
The reward component would decline or disappear, leaving the fee component of 208.0% as the main measurable return source. Because reward dependency and the pool lifecycle are not confirmed, an LP should assess whether trading fees alone justify remaining in the position before incentives end.
Risk is elevated because MOG can move sharply against SOL, liquidity may be thinner than in major SOL pairs, and a concentrated position can leave its active price range. The pool's $44K liquidity and 0.95x volume-to-liquidity ratio should be considered alongside the unavailable recent range and impermanent-loss history.
Risk is elevated because MOG can move sharply against SOL, liquidity may be thinner than in major SOL pairs, and a concentrated position can leave its active price range. The pool's $44K liquidity and 0.95x volume-to-liquidity ratio should be considered alongside the unavailable recent range and impermanent-loss history.
For SOL-MOG, an exit is reasonable when the position moves out of range, fee income weakens materially, liquidity begins draining, or MOG's market becomes difficult to exit without substantial price impact. Do not rely on emissions continuing if the reward schedule is uncertain or decaying.
For SOL-MOG, an exit is reasonable when the position moves out of range, fee income weakens materially, liquidity begins draining, or MOG's market becomes difficult to exit without substantial price impact. Do not rely on emissions continuing if the reward schedule is uncertain or decaying.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss and time-in-range data are unavailable, and fee income varies with trading volume. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 208.0% can offset the position's divergence loss before the LP exits, rather than assuming the headline 500.0% persists.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss and time-in-range data are unavailable, and fee income varies with trading volume. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 208.0% can offset the position's divergence loss before the LP exits, rather than assuming the headline 500.0% persists.
