new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 45/100, with Enter at 39/100, Hold at 53/100, and Exit at 27/100; the live verdict HOLD reflects the stated combination of high risk, represented by 68/100, and weak yield. At rank #602 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, this is not positioned as a leading pool in the protocol set. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume growth that raises fee APR, deeper and more persistent liquidity, or a lower risk score; a TVL drain, weaker trading activity, or any yield collapse would reinforce the avoid classification.
Computed 2026-07-24 00:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$197.92K
Total value locked
$2.62K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a wider range than a normal correlated-asset position because tick-in-range history is unavailable, and set a hard exit trigger if 24-hour volume falls below $3K for several sessions or pool TVL falls materially below $198K; do not wait for emissions to justify staying.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.62K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.54 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-NEIRO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1381 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3673 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-NEIRO liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NEIRO into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens, especially because NEIRO is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.9% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, making 100% of the yield fee-funded. Reward dependency and the duration of any future emissions are not established, so the current return should be assessed as dependent on swap activity rather than scheduled farm incentives. For a MEMECOIN pool, emission decay would further reduce the case for holding if rewards begin later and then decline; exit timing should therefore follow fee generation and liquidity conditions, not an assumed emissions schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so realized IL and range efficiency cannot be verified from the supplied data. The MEMECOIN classification adds sharp price divergence, thin-exit-liquidity, and token-specific failure risk; low turnover relative to liquidity also limits fee generation. Emission decay is an additional risk if future rewards are introduced, because a declining subsidy could leave fees insufficient to compensate LP risk.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. For this LP, a SOL price move relative to NEIRO changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere; that external liquidity may help trading exits but does not remove pair-specific risk.
tollNEIRO Context
NEIRO is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery, liquidity, and sentiment are more concentrated and less predictable than SOL's. A sharp NEIRO move against SOL can push the LP position toward the weaker-performing asset, while a liquidity contraction can make both rebalancing and withdrawal more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NEIRO into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens, especially because NEIRO is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HvAqakZgurMR2br1eGWPU6EeFcxzmeW8n6Mn7ejEf3DV
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- NEIRO (CTg3ZgYx…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee APR is 0.9% and total APR is 0.9%. Because no current reward contribution is reflected, emission decay has little direct effect today, but any future subsidy would make APR fall as emissions decline unless trading volume increases.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee APR is 0.9% and total APR is 0.9%. Because no current reward contribution is reflected, emission decay has little direct effect today, but any future subsidy would make APR fall as emissions decline unless trading volume increases.
The pool would rely on trading fees, with fee-only APR at 0.9%, rather than rewards. Since reward duration is not established and reward APR is currently 0.0%, an incentive expiry would mainly confirm that fee generation is the sole basis for the return.
The pool would rely on trading fees, with fee-only APR at 0.9%, rather than rewards. Since reward duration is not established and reward APR is currently 0.0%, an incentive expiry would mainly confirm that fee generation is the sole basis for the return.
This pool carries a high risk score of 68/100, and its MEMECOIN classification adds volatile price divergence and uncertain exit liquidity. The 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio and total APR of 0.9% indicate limited current fee compensation for those risks.
This pool carries a high risk score of 68/100, and its MEMECOIN classification adds volatile price divergence and uncertain exit liquidity. The 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio and total APR of 0.9% indicate limited current fee compensation for those risks.
For SOL-NEIRO, consider exiting if volume remains below $3K, TVL falls materially below $198K, or the fee APR no longer compensates for NEIRO price and liquidity risk. A worsening risk score or a move toward the pool's 27/100 exit threshold would also support removal.
For SOL-NEIRO, consider exiting if volume remains below $3K, TVL falls materially below $198K, or the fee APR no longer compensates for NEIRO price and liquidity risk. A worsening risk score or a move toward the pool's 27/100 exit threshold would also support removal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future SOL-NEIRO price divergence is unknown. The only current offset is fee income at 0.9%, so break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether NEIRO volatility creates additional loss.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future SOL-NEIRO price divergence is unknown. The only current offset is fee income at 0.9%, so break-even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether NEIRO volatility creates additional loss.
