new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That places SOL-BIG at rank #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, while the ai_engine reads hold and the scanner is CRITICAL; the strong exit signal is unopposed. In practical terms, the score does not support adding liquidity under current conditions despite fee-only yield, low turnover, and uncertain pool persistence. A sustained increase in volume and TVL, clearance of the critical scanner finding, and durable fee generation could change the assessment; a TVL drain, further volume contraction, or collapse in fee yield would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-15 23:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$31.91K
Total value locked
$35.33
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -12.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range only if you can rebalance promptly, and set an exit trigger when volume falls materially below $35 or when the scanner's CRITICAL status is joined by a visible TVL drain; do not leave the position unattended through an emission change.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $35.33 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.09 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-BIG pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13365 of 85203 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19257 of 141086
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-BIG liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BIG into a shared pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. The pool currently has limited activity, and the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if BIG moves sharply or liquidity becomes difficult to exit.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of the reported yield is fee-funded, so APR does not currently depend on emissions; reward dependency remains unclear, and no rewards horizon is established. With 0.00x volume relative to TVL, fee generation is constrained by limited turnover rather than by a stated reward program.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price-path damage and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-BIG carries sharp repricing, thin-liquidity, and exit-timing risk; emission decay would further reduce any future reward component, while a decline in trading activity would weaken fee income. The low turnover relative to TVL also raises the risk that exiting a position becomes more costly as liquidity withdraws.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established Solana asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across the broader Solana market than this pool provides. For this LP, a SOL price move against BIG changes the pool's inventory mix and can create divergence loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. SOL liquidity outside the pool may help execution, but it does not remove pool-specific price impact or memecoin risk.
tollBIG Context
BIG is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other fragmented venues than SOL's. A sharp BIG move can rebalance the LP toward the falling asset and increase divergence loss, while weak BIG demand can make withdrawal execution more difficult. The pool's limited TVL and volume provide little evidence of deep secondary liquidity for BIG.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BIG into a shared pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. The pool currently has limited activity, and the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if BIG moves sharply or liquidity becomes difficult to exit.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HvGdRNTyoT1vbZAmZLYuAjQ6nFfX5pNouumTLmL1HQyY
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- BIG (Foot4fxy…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
24%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
9%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 0.8% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. If future BIG emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall while fee income would still depend on the 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio.
The current APR is split between 0.8% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. If future BIG emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall while fee income would still depend on the 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio.
The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving the fee component of 0.8% as the main stated source of return. Because current reward dependency is unclear, the pool should not be valued on assumed future incentives; its fee base is tied to $35 in recent volume.
The reward component would disappear or decline, leaving the fee component of 0.8% as the main stated source of return. Because current reward dependency is unclear, the pool should not be valued on assumed future incentives; its fee base is tied to $35 in recent volume.
SOL-BIG combines SOL exposure with BIG's memecoin volatility, limited pool liquidity of $32K, and a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio. The scanner is CRITICAL and the live verdict is EXIT, so price divergence, withdrawal slippage, and liquidity deterioration are material risks.
SOL-BIG combines SOL exposure with BIG's memecoin volatility, limited pool liquidity of $32K, and a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio. The scanner is CRITICAL and the live verdict is EXIT, so price divergence, withdrawal slippage, and liquidity deterioration are material risks.
For SOL-BIG, an exit review is warranted if TVL falls from $32K, volume weakens from $35, or the CRITICAL scanner status persists while BIG loses liquidity elsewhere. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for an incentive change rather than monitoring liquidity and execution conditions would be inconsistent with the pool's risk profile.
For SOL-BIG, an exit review is warranted if TVL falls from $32K, volume weakens from $35, or the CRITICAL scanner status persists while BIG loses liquidity elsewhere. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for an incentive change rather than monitoring liquidity and execution conditions would be inconsistent with the pool's risk profile.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The fee-only component is 0.8%, and with 0.00x turnover relative to TVL, fee accumulation may be too limited to offset a sharp SOL-BIG price divergence on a predictable schedule.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The fee-only component is 0.8%, and with 0.00x turnover relative to TVL, fee accumulation may be too limited to offset a sharp SOL-BIG price divergence on a predictable schedule.
