new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #475 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it relatively high in the listed ranking, but the score should not be read as a guarantee of liquidity or fee persistence: the pool remains small at $38K and has a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio. A material TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, fee-yield collapse, or an AOC liquidity shock would change the assessment toward exit, while durable volume and stable liquidity would support the hold view.
Computed 2026-09-21 18:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$38.18K
Total value locked
$36.40
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -42.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If using a range-based position, set the initial SOL/AOC range around the current price and rebalance when price exits that range; withdraw rather than widening the range after a sharp AOC move unless observed volume and liquidity remain sufficient for execution.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $36.40 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.09 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-AOC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4049 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8222 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AOC liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOC into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and AOC, especially if AOC moves sharply or becomes difficult to sell.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 0.1% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100% of yield coming from trading fees. Because the reward component is currently absent, emission decay is not presently the main APR risk; fee income instead depends on continued SOL-AOC trading volume. Reward duration and dependency are not established, so future incentive changes cannot be projected from the available pool data.
shieldRisk Assessment
A measured seven-day impermanent-loss figure and seven-day tick-range history are not available, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. This is a MEMECOIN pool: AOC repricing, thin liquidity, and abrupt volume loss can increase mark-to-market losses and make exit execution difficult. Emission decay is a secondary concern while reward APR is absent, but an LP should treat incentive changes and short exit timing as material risks if rewards are introduced later.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's liquid, widely traded base asset and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pair. SOL price moves change the relative SOL/AOC price and can push a concentrated LP position outside its intended range, while broad SOL liquidity may provide alternative exit venues.
tollAOC Context
AOC is the pool's memecoin-side asset, so its price discovery and liquidity are more dependent on this market and other AOC venues. A sharp AOC move against SOL can create impermanent loss and may leave the LP holding a larger share of the weaker-performing asset when withdrawing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AOC into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding SOL and AOC, especially if AOC moves sharply or becomes difficult to sell.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HwGQLubjSqYqCUcTQm9W9yJnfKNpUVz4DQ3US2vVvT3T
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AOC (GfkfESc5…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
224%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
23%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently account for a reported part of the APR. The present 0.1% return is tied to 0.1% trading-fee income, which will vary with volume.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently account for a reported part of the APR. The present 0.1% return is tied to 0.1% trading-fee income, which will vary with volume.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a reported reward stream at present. The remaining return would depend on trading fees of 0.1%, and could decline if volume does not persist.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a reported reward stream at present. The remaining return would depend on trading fees of 0.1%, and could decline if volume does not persist.
Risk is elevated because AOC can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the pool's TVL is $38K against a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the size of those effects cannot be estimated from the supplied data.
Risk is elevated because AOC can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the pool's TVL is $38K against a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the size of those effects cannot be estimated from the supplied data.
Set an exit rule before entering and act if AOC liquidity deteriorates, the position leaves its intended range, or fee income no longer compensates for price risk. A sustained TVL drain or falling volume from the current 0.00x ratio would be a concrete reason to reassess.
Set an exit rule before entering and act if AOC liquidity deteriorates, the position leaves its intended range, or fee income no longer compensates for price risk. A sustained TVL drain or falling volume from the current 0.00x ratio would be a concrete reason to reassess.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on future trading volume. Compare accumulated fees, currently represented by 0.1%, with the position's loss relative to holding SOL and AOC; fee accrual alone does not guarantee recovery.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on future trading volume. Compare accumulated fees, currently represented by 0.1%, with the position's loss relative to holding SOL and AOC; fee accrual alone does not guarantee recovery.
