Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
SOL-BAOS is differentiated by relying entirely on trading fees rather than advertised reward emissions, but its low activity limits the pool's utility for LP yield. TVL is $34K against $534 in 24h volume, with a 0.02x volume-to-liquidity ratio. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, while no seven-day IL history is available for comparison.
Computed 2026-09-05 07:23 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.40K
Total value locked
$534.18
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 10.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a full-range position until reliable tick history is available, then review it whenever rolling 24h volume remains below $534 for three consecutive days; exit rather than add liquidity if that weakness coincides with a sharp BAOS move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $534.18 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.34 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-baos pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-baos liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BAOS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 1.6%, but the amount of each token you hold changes as prices move, and the available data does not show how much loss that has recently caused.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed return decomposes into 1.6% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, for a total APR of 1.6%. 99% of yield is fee-funded, so the return does not currently depend on a visible reward component. The reward schedule and its remaining duration are not established; LPs should not assume that any future emissions will persist.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent loss from price divergence and range utilization cannot be measured from this data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-BAOS carries elevated exposure to abrupt BAOS price moves, thin liquidity, and rapid changes in trading activity. Emission decay and exit timing matter: if incentives appear later, they may decline quickly, and an exit plan should be based on volume, price divergence, and liquidity conditions rather than on a presumed reward duration.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than BAOS. For this LP, a strong SOL move against BAOS changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL liquidity elsewhere remains deep. SOL's broader market activity may support routing, but this pool's own fee generation depends on volume arriving here.
tollbaos Context
BAOS is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price can move sharply on sentiment, listings, or liquidity withdrawals. Compared with SOL, BAOS is likely to have shallower liquidity outside this pool, making exits more sensitive to slippage and price impact. A BAOS rally or collapse relative to SOL can leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset after rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BAOS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 1.6%, but the amount of each token you hold changes as prices move, and the available data does not show how much loss that has recently caused.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- J2Ms2iGyap4ePrkuEx2rnn4FtaRVjwqKkC2gKHX1frAV
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- baos (UHaVCzi4…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
9%
APR
103%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is split between 1.6% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, producing 1.6% overall. If emissions decay, the reward portion can fall further, while fee income remains dependent on actual trading volume.
The current return is split between 1.6% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, producing 1.6% overall. If emissions decay, the reward portion can fall further, while fee income remains dependent on actual trading volume.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the remaining source of yield. Because 99% of the stated return is already fee-funded and the reward schedule is not established, the post-incentive APR should be evaluated from realized volume rather than assumed rewards.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the remaining source of yield. Because 99% of the stated return is already fee-funded and the reward schedule is not established, the post-incentive APR should be evaluated from realized volume rather than assumed rewards.
The main risks are BAOS price volatility, impermanent loss, thin exit liquidity, and declining trade activity. This pool has $34K of liquidity and $534 in 24h volume, while recent IL and range-use history are unavailable, so the risk cannot be assessed from a recent performance series.
The main risks are BAOS price volatility, impermanent loss, thin exit liquidity, and declining trade activity. This pool has $34K of liquidity and $534 in 24h volume, while recent IL and range-use history are unavailable, so the risk cannot be assessed from a recent performance series.
Consider exiting when BAOS liquidity deteriorates, the rolling volume stays below $534, or BAOS moves sharply against SOL without enough fees to offset the resulting inventory imbalance. Also reassess immediately if any future reward program begins to decay or ends.
Consider exiting when BAOS liquidity deteriorates, the rolling volume stays below $534, or BAOS moves sharply against SOL without enough fees to offset the resulting inventory imbalance. Also reassess immediately if any future reward program begins to decay or ends.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. The starting reference is 1.6% in annualized fee yield, but realized fees must be compared with the position's actual loss from SOL-BAOS price divergence.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. The starting reference is 1.6% in annualized fee yield, but realized fees must be compared with the position's actual loss from SOL-BAOS price divergence.
