new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 5/100 sits below its Enter threshold of 7/100, below its Hold threshold of 3/100, and far below its Exit threshold of 98/100, producing the live verdict EXIT. The pool ranks #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, while the underlying signals conflict only superficially: ai_engine=hold, but scanner=CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The assessment would improve with sustained volume, deeper TVL, and a scanner downgrade; it would worsen with a TVL drain, fee-yield collapse, or worsening RELAX liquidity.
Computed 2026-07-29 06:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$27.98K
Total value locked
$456.54
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up17.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 7.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL signal as an exit trigger: do not widen or renew a position after a material TVL drain, a further collapse in fee-generating volume, or continued failure of the pool to support its current 15.9%. If entering, use a narrow range only with a predefined rebalance or exit rule rather than passively leaving capital deployed.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 17.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 15.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $456.54 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-relax pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14727 of 41916 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 25% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18527 of 76620
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-relax liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RELAX into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that falls in relative price, and low trading activity may not provide enough fees to offset that risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 15.9% from trading fees and 1.3% from rewards, with 92% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the only currently identifiable source of return; the low 0.02x turnover ratio makes that fee rate sensitive to any further decline in trading activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available, so realized divergence loss and range utilization cannot be assessed from the reported metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-RELAX also carries emission-decay and exit-timing risk: liquidity and trading interest can contract faster than fees compensate, and an LP may need to exit before a liquidity drain or token repricing becomes visible in annualized returns.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. SOL price movement relative to RELAX determines the LP's inventory shift and can create divergence loss even when the pool continues to collect fees.
tollrelax Context
RELAX is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity depth and price discovery should not be inferred from SOL's broader market liquidity. A sharp RELAX move, thin external liquidity, or fading attention can change the pair composition and make exit execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RELAX into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that falls in relative price, and low trading activity may not provide enough fees to offset that risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- J6zde59KbySqZynHNQrWXH8ESrmT9vQGyr4hmLeJ5Txj
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- relax (6LYqVzVf…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
23%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current breakdown assigns 1.3% to rewards and 15.9% to fees, so emission decay has no displayed reward contribution to reduce at present. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the pool's total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset the change.
The current breakdown assigns 1.3% to rewards and 15.9% to fees, so emission decay has no displayed reward contribution to reduce at present. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the pool's total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset the change.
The current reward component is 1.3%, so expiry would leave the fee component of 15.9% as the identifiable return source. With 0.02x turnover, fee income may not replace lost incentives if trading activity remains weak.
The current reward component is 1.3%, so expiry would leave the fee component of 15.9% as the identifiable return source. With 0.02x turnover, fee income may not replace lost incentives if trading activity remains weak.
Risk is elevated because RELAX can lose liquidity or reprice sharply while SOL has deeper and more active markets elsewhere. This pool also has $28K of liquidity, $457 in 24h volume, and a EXIT assessment, leaving limited evidence that fees can reliably offset divergence and exit risk.
Risk is elevated because RELAX can lose liquidity or reprice sharply while SOL has deeper and more active markets elsewhere. This pool also has $28K of liquidity, $457 in 24h volume, and a EXIT assessment, leaving limited evidence that fees can reliably offset divergence and exit risk.
For SOL-RELAX, an exit is reasonable when the scanner remains CRITICAL, TVL drains, fee-generating volume weakens, or RELAX liquidity deteriorates. The current EXIT should be treated as the default exit signal unless sustained volume and liquidity materially improve.
For SOL-RELAX, an exit is reasonable when the scanner remains CRITICAL, TVL drains, fee-generating volume weakens, or RELAX liquidity deteriorates. The current EXIT should be treated as the default exit signal unless sustained volume and liquidity materially improve.
A fixed break-even period cannot be established because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unpredictable. At 17.2% annualized return, fees would need sustained activity over time to offset any divergence loss, and the low 0.02x turnover ratio weakens confidence in that assumption.
A fixed break-even period cannot be established because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unpredictable. At 17.2% annualized return, fees would need sustained activity over time to offset any divergence loss, and the low 0.02x turnover ratio weakens confidence in that assumption.
