Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 57% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID. Its #149 of 1834 ranking among meteora-damm-v2 pools places it above most listed pools, but the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold rather than a clear entry signal. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume failed to support 3.8%, fee sustainability weakened, or a verifiable reward schedule materially improved risk-adjusted returns.
Computed 2026-10-26 15:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$239.63K
Total value locked
$9.44K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -65.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a predefined 2Z/SOL price band that you can monitor at least daily; if the price exits that band or 24-hour volume falls materially from the level implied by 0.04x, remove liquidity or reposition rather than leaving the position passively single-sided.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $9.44K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $22.71 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 2Z-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#422 of 2467 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7061 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the 2Z-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing 2Z and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the asset that performed worse, and a memecoin can become difficult to sell quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 3.8% fee-only APR and 0.1% reward-only APR. 98% of yield comes from trading fees, and the supplied metrics do not establish a reward schedule or remaining reward period. For this MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as temporary and should not be used to justify holding after their economics weaken.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range observations are not available in the supplied data, so price-path and range-management risk cannot be quantified from those fields. As a MEMECOIN pool, 2Z-SOL carries asymmetric token-price and liquidity risk: a sharp 2Z move can leave the LP holding a greater share of the weaker asset, while a rapid move outside the active range can reduce fee generation. Emission decay is also relevant to exit timing, even though the current yield is fee-led; reassess before remaining in the position through a volume or liquidity deterioration.
toll2Z Context
2Z is the memecoin side of this pool and is the main source of token-specific volatility for the LP. The supplied metrics do not establish 2Z's liquidity depth elsewhere, so a price move may be harder to exit efficiently than a comparable move in SOL. If 2Z falls or rises sharply against SOL, the LP's inventory mix changes and fee income may not offset that price divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset paired against 2Z and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a memecoin. That liquidity can make SOL the easier side to value and exit, but SOL price changes still affect the pool's relative price and active range. A strong SOL move against 2Z can produce the same inventory-shift and range risks as a strong 2Z move.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing 2Z and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the asset that performed worse, and a memecoin can become difficult to sell quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- JCpiRDLFJxdEPsd1rb6Y1xqPRsxwgkdfXKuW53yZWA3P
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- 2Z (J6pQQ3FA…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 9/25/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
4%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current yield is represented by 3.8% in fees and 0.1% in rewards, with 98% coming from trading fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward portion would decline over time; the fee component would still depend on trading volume.
The current yield is represented by 3.8% in fees and 0.1% in rewards, with 98% coming from trading fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward portion would decline over time; the fee component would still depend on trading volume.
The reward component would fall away, leaving the pool dependent on 3.8% from swaps rather than incentives. Because the current reward contribution is 0.1%, the main remaining question is whether volume can sustain the fee yield at 98%.
The reward component would fall away, leaving the pool dependent on 3.8% from swaps rather than incentives. Because the current reward contribution is 0.1%, the main remaining question is whether volume can sustain the fee yield at 98%.
The principal risks are 2Z price volatility, changing inventory relative to SOL, reduced liquidity during a selloff, and time spent outside the active range. The pool currently shows $240K of liquidity and $9K in 24-hour volume, so execution conditions can change materially if either measure deteriorates.
The principal risks are 2Z price volatility, changing inventory relative to SOL, reduced liquidity during a selloff, and time spent outside the active range. The pool currently shows $240K of liquidity and $9K in 24-hour volume, so execution conditions can change materially if either measure deteriorates.
Use a predefined exit rule: withdraw or reposition when 2Z/SOL leaves your chosen range, when liquidity begins draining, or when fee income no longer justifies the token and range risk. For this pool, a sustained decline in volume from the level associated with 0.04x would weaken the fee-based case.
Use a predefined exit rule: withdraw or reposition when 2Z/SOL leaves your chosen range, when liquidity begins draining, or when fee income no longer justifies the token and range risk. For this pool, a sustained decline in volume from the level associated with 0.04x would weaken the fee-based case.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not provided. Fee income is represented by 3.8%, but actual recovery depends on future volume, the path of 2Z versus SOL, and whether the position remains in range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not provided. Fee income is represented by 3.8%, but actual recovery depends on future volume, the path of 2Z versus SOL, and whether the position remains in range.
