SOL-BORGon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $473.44K
- APR
- 26.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $95.60K 24h vol
- Pool address
- KLkoFSdC…FXuk · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 55/100, with Enter 50/100, Hold 61/100, and Exit 20/100; the live verdict is HOLD. The pool ranks #70 of 2506 orca-whirlpool pools, but the displayed verdict remains HOLD because the ai_engine has an enter signal whose promotion to ENTER is pending a 12-hour dwell period. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume contracts, or fee APR collapses; it would strengthen if fee generation persists without a comparable increase in liquidity or deterioration in BORG exit conditions.
Computed 2026-08-23 13:04 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$473.44K
Total value locked
$95.60K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up26.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 28.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a concentrated range centered on the current SOL/BORG price, and rebalance or reduce exposure if price leaves the range or if 24h volume falls materially below its current 0.20x volume-to-TVL level for several sessions.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 26.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 23.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $95.60K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $286.68 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-BORG pools
by AI Farmer Score
#278 of 13395 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1700 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-BORG liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BORG into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of your two assets can change, especially because BORG is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into 23.3% from trading fees and 2.9% from rewards, with 89% of yield attributed to trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the reward component should not be treated as durable income or projected beyond the currently observed conditions. The fee APR is variable: it can decline if SOL-BORG volume falls, liquidity rises without matching volume, or traders move to another pool.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so there is no short-history evidence here for how efficiently this position has remained active. As a MEMECOIN pool, BORG can experience abrupt price repricing, thin exit liquidity, and one-sided demand; SOL-BORG LPs should account for emission decay and avoid assuming that current fee conditions will persist after speculative activity fades. Exit timing matters because waiting for volume to recover can leave an LP exposed while BORG loses value or liquidity.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than BORG. If SOL appreciates or falls sharply relative to BORG, the concentrated position can accumulate more of the weaker-performing asset and realize a different SOL/BORG mix than the initial deposit.
tollBORG Context
BORG is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity is more dependent on continued attention and trading activity than SOL's. A rapid BORG price decline can create adverse inventory exposure for the LP, while a rapid rise can leave the LP with less BORG and more SOL than a passive holder would retain.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BORG into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of your two assets can change, especially because BORG is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- KLkoFSdCpC523EmmGyJxmLv1A3itv8ZNiMZwjPmFXuk
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- BORG (3dQTr7ro…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed reward APR is 2.9%, while fee APR is 23.3% and total APR is 26.2%. Because the yield is reported as 89% fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main stated source of return, but any future incentive reduction would remove part of the reward component rather than the trading-fee component.
The displayed reward APR is 2.9%, while fee APR is 23.3% and total APR is 26.2%. Because the yield is reported as 89% fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main stated source of return, but any future incentive reduction would remove part of the reward component rather than the trading-fee component.
If incentives expire, the reward component represented by 2.9% would fall toward zero, leaving trading fees represented by 23.3% as the main yield source. Since fee income varies with activity, the resulting return would depend on SOL-BORG volume and liquidity rather than a fixed subsidy.
If incentives expire, the reward component represented by 2.9% would fall toward zero, leaving trading fees represented by 23.3% as the main yield source. Since fee income varies with activity, the resulting return would depend on SOL-BORG volume and liquidity rather than a fixed subsidy.
The risk is high relative to a SOL-stablecoin pool because BORG can lose value quickly and its trading liquidity can thin during a selloff. The current position also has no available seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range history, so N/A and N/A cannot be used to quantify recent behavior.
The risk is high relative to a SOL-stablecoin pool because BORG can lose value quickly and its trading liquidity can thin during a selloff. The current position also has no available seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range history, so N/A and N/A cannot be used to quantify recent behavior.
Consider reducing or exiting if BORG liquidity deteriorates, SOL-BORG volume falls materially below its current 0.20x volume-to-TVL level, or price remains outside your chosen range. A sustained decline in fee APR from 23.3% or a material TVL drain would also invalidate the current fee-based thesis.
Consider reducing or exiting if BORG liquidity deteriorates, SOL-BORG volume falls materially below its current 0.20x volume-to-TVL level, or price remains outside your chosen range. A sustained decline in fee APR from 23.3% or a material TVL drain would also invalidate the current fee-based thesis.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and price movement. At the current displayed total APR of 26.2%, a simple annualized estimate would still be unreliable because that rate is variable and does not account for BORG price changes, range inactivity, or rebalancing costs.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and price movement. At the current displayed total APR of 26.2%, a simple annualized estimate would still be unreliable because that rate is variable and does not account for BORG price changes, range inactivity, or rebalancing costs.
