new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #699 among 2403 raydium-amm pools indicates it is not among the strongest pools in the set, despite ranking above many alternatives. The assessment would improve with sustained volume, deeper TVL, and durable fee generation; a TVL drain, further volume loss, or collapse in fee yield would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-24 23:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$75.84K
Total value locked
$0.21
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -14.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
For an existing LP position, treat the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal as the rebalance trigger: remove liquidity or reduce exposure rather than widening the range. A new position should require evidence of sustained volume and fee generation before entry.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $0.21 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 $GARY-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14098 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 17% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19764 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the $GARY-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing $GARY and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool currently has no reward-funded component, and the value of your deposit can fall if $GARY and SOL move apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.1% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component cushioning weak volume. Reward dependency and any reward expiration schedule are not established; emission decay therefore remains a family-level risk rather than a quantified timetable.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are not reported, so recent loss behavior and concentrated-liquidity exposure cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, $GARY-SOL is exposed to sharp token repricing, shallow exit liquidity, and adverse divergence between $GARY and SOL. Emission decay can remove any future incentive support quickly, making exit timing important if volume or liquidity deteriorates.
toll$GARY Context
$GARY is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price changes directly affect the inventory and valuation of an LP position. Liquidity depth for $GARY outside this pool is not established here; a sharp decline in $GARY can produce inventory concentration and make withdrawal or rebalancing more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against $GARY, and its price movement determines whether the pool's two assets diverge or move together. Broader SOL liquidity is not quantified in this pool data, but SOL price changes still alter the pair ratio and can drive impermanent loss when $GARY does not follow.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing $GARY and SOL into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool currently has no reward-funded component, and the value of your deposit can fall if $GARY and SOL move apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- N4UXh61ifRriJN9g8ZPCeNdyNy7EzCq3mW3iWNS6S2S
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- $GARY (8c71AvjQ…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
81%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
33%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently provide a measurable supplement to fee income. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce Total APR toward the fee-only level of 0.1% unless trading volume increases.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently provide a measurable supplement to fee income. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce Total APR toward the fee-only level of 0.1% unless trading volume increases.
Because reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiry would not remove a current reward stream, but any future incentives would disappear and leave fee income as the remaining source of yield. With 24h volume of $0 and Vol/TVL of 0.00x, fee replacement would depend on materially stronger trading activity.
Because reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiry would not remove a current reward stream, but any future incentives would disappear and leave fee income as the remaining source of yield. With 24h volume of $0 and Vol/TVL of 0.00x, fee replacement would depend on materially stronger trading activity.
Risk is high relative to a stable or established-asset pair because $GARY can reprice sharply, liquidity can be thin, and the pool's recent impermanent-loss and range data are not reported. The pool also carries a live EXIT verdict and a scanner-level CRITICAL signal.
Risk is high relative to a stable or established-asset pair because $GARY can reprice sharply, liquidity can be thin, and the pool's recent impermanent-loss and range data are not reported. The pool also carries a live EXIT verdict and a scanner-level CRITICAL signal.
For this pool, the existing CRITICAL and unopposed EXIT signal is a concrete exit condition, especially if TVL falls, volume weakens, or fee-only APR declines from 0.1%. Do not wait for incentives to compensate for deteriorating liquidity when the reward-only component is 0.0%.
For this pool, the existing CRITICAL and unopposed EXIT signal is a concrete exit condition, especially if TVL falls, volume weakens, or fee-only APR declines from 0.1%. Do not wait for incentives to compensate for deteriorating liquidity when the reward-only component is 0.0%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and current volume is limited. At fee-only APR of 0.1%, recovery depends on future fee accrual and the path of $GARY relative to SOL, so the nominal APR is not a break-even guarantee.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and current volume is limited. At fee-only APR of 0.1%, recovery depends on future fee accrual and the path of $GARY relative to SOL, so the nominal APR is not a break-even guarantee.
