seige-Chudon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $41.24K
- APR
- 0.4% APR
- 24h Volume
- $37.20 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- fcRgKaWF…tskU · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score places this pool near the lower end of the raydium-clmm set, at rank #567 of 1157, while the Enter, Hold, and Exit thresholds are 15/100, 20/100, and 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT because ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume growth, deeper effective liquidity, a cleared scanner warning, or a materially stronger score; a TVL drain, lower fee income, or further reduction in trading activity would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-20 22:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$41.24K
Total value locked
$37.20
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -3.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored tick range only if you can rebalance promptly; exit or remove liquidity if the position leaves range, if volume remains below the level implied by 0.00x, or if the scanner's CRITICAL status persists.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $37.20 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.37 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 seige-Chud pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1338 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 21% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19928 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the seige-Chud liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SEIGE and CHUD into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token, and low trading activity limits the fees available.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield is composed of 0.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of the total coming from fees. Reward dependency and the incentive schedule are not established here, so future emissions cannot be projected or assigned a remaining duration. The fee component therefore represents the clearer source of return, but $37 in 24-hour volume provides a limited fee base against $41K of liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and seven-day tick-in-range data are not available, so recent loss magnitude and range utilization cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SEIGE-CHUD carries sharp token-price divergence risk, concentrated-liquidity out-of-range risk, and liquidity withdrawal risk when attention or emissions decay. Exit timing matters more than in a mature pair: an LP should be prepared to reduce exposure before volume, liquidity, or market interest contracts materially.
tollseige Context
SEIGE is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so its price changes relative to CHUD determine whether the position remains balanced and in range. This pool data does not establish SEIGE's liquidity depth elsewhere; a sharp SEIGE move can leave the LP holding mostly one token or unable to earn fees across the selected range. SEIGE price action should therefore be evaluated against available exit liquidity, not only the displayed APR.
tollChud Context
CHUD is the other side of the SEIGE-CHUD pair and supplies the counter-asset against which SEIGE's price is measured. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by this pool data, while a rapid CHUD repricing can push the position out of range and amplify inventory imbalance. Weak volume means such repricing may be difficult to offset with fee income.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SEIGE and CHUD into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token, and low trading activity limits the fees available.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- fcRgKaWFsKQUPBJ6JUU7o6v2HC9q3S7W6vSTnHktskU
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- seige (HipYKXiD…)
- Token B
- Chud (6yjNqPzT…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward-based APR and 0.4% in fee APR, with 100% of yield from fees. Because the reward schedule is not established, emission decay could reduce the displayed total without a reliable forecast of when that reduction occurs.
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward-based APR and 0.4% in fee APR, with 100% of yield from fees. Because the reward schedule is not established, emission decay could reduce the displayed total without a reliable forecast of when that reduction occurs.
If incentives expire, the reward component could fall to zero and the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.4%. With $37 in 24-hour volume against $41K of TVL, fee income may not compensate for the loss of incentives.
If incentives expire, the reward component could fall to zero and the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.4%. With $37 in 24-hour volume against $41K of TVL, fee income may not compensate for the loss of incentives.
Risk is high because both assets are memecoins, recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, and the pool has a EXIT verdict with a CRITICAL scanner status. Low activity also makes it harder for fee income to offset price divergence or for an LP to exit without adverse execution.
Risk is high because both assets are memecoins, recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, and the pool has a EXIT verdict with a CRITICAL scanner status. Low activity also makes it harder for fee income to offset price divergence or for an LP to exit without adverse execution.
For SEIGE-CHUD, an exit is more defensible when the position leaves its selected range, volume weakens further from 0.00x, or the CRITICAL scanner signal remains unresolved. The live EXIT verdict and unopposed EXIT signal favor predefined exit rules rather than waiting for emissions to offset losses.
For SEIGE-CHUD, an exit is more defensible when the position leaves its selected range, volume weakens further from 0.00x, or the CRITICAL scanner signal remains unresolved. The live EXIT verdict and unopposed EXIT signal favor predefined exit rules rather than waiting for emissions to offset losses.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the reward schedule is not established. Any recovery would have to come from fee income at 0.4% and future price convergence, while $37 in daily volume limits confidence in that path.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the reward schedule is not established. Any recovery would have to come from fee income at 0.4% and future price convergence, while $37 in daily volume limits confidence in that path.
