seige-Chudon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $20.85K
- APR
- 12.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $377.29 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- fcRgKaWF…tskU · observed 2026-10-26
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. The hold score exceeding the enter and exit readings indicates a neutral assessment rather than a strong new-entry signal, consistent with fee-only yield and limited trading activity. The pool ranks #1609 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, which places it above many listed pools but does not remove its MEMECOIN and liquidity risks. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee generation, worsening price divergence, or a change from fee-only economics to emissions-dependent yield would change the assessment.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$20.85K
Total value locked
$377.29
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up12.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 10.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range you can actively monitor, rebalance when price approaches either boundary, and exit if fee accrual no longer compensates for worsening liquidity or sustained price divergence between SEIGE and CHUD.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 12.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 11.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $377.29 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.77 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 seige-Chud pools
by AI Farmer Score
#592 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4537 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the seige-Chud liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SEIGE and CHUD into a trading pool so others can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of one token and less of the other, with losses relative to simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 11.4% from trading fees and 0.7% from rewards. 94% of the reported yield comes from fees, so the current APR does not depend on an active reward stream. Reward duration is not established, and any future emission schedule would need to be assessed separately from the current fee-derived return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so there is no measured history here for estimating how efficiently the position stayed in range. As a MEMECOIN pool, SEIGE-CHUD is exposed to sharp, correlated price moves, thin liquidity, and rapid changes in trading demand. Its emission schedule and lifecycle are not established; if incentives are introduced or decay, exit timing should be based on realized fee income, liquidity changes, and whether the position remains usable rather than on headline APR alone.
tollseige Context
SEIGE is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so its price movement against CHUD determines how the position's inventory shifts and whether liquidity remains in range. Available pool data does not establish SEIGE's liquidity depth elsewhere. A sharp SEIGE move can produce inventory imbalance and impermanent loss even when fee income continues.
tollChud Context
CHUD is the other side of the pair and provides the counter-asset against which SEIGE is priced in this pool. Available data does not establish CHUD's broader liquidity depth, so a move in CHUD can be amplified by thin market conditions. For this LP, CHUD volatility can push the position out of range or leave it concentrated in the weaker-performing token.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SEIGE and CHUD into a trading pool so others can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of one token and less of the other, with losses relative to simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- fcRgKaWFsKQUPBJ6JUU7o6v2HC9q3S7W6vSTnHktskU
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- seige (HipYKXiD…)
- Token B
- Chud (6yjNqPzT…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.7%, while fee yield is 11.4%, so reported returns are currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward component without directly changing trading-fee income.
The current reward-only component is 0.7%, while fee yield is 11.4%, so reported returns are currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward component without directly changing trading-fee income.
Current reward income is 0.7%, so there is no reported reward stream to remove from the present APR. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining reference point would be the fee-only rate of 11.4%, subject to changes in trading volume and liquidity.
Current reward income is 0.7%, so there is no reported reward stream to remove from the present APR. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining reference point would be the fee-only rate of 11.4%, subject to changes in trading volume and liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile pair because both assets can move sharply and liquidity may be limited; pool TVL is $21K and the volume-to-TVL ratio is 0.02x. Recent impermanent-loss and range-retention readings are unavailable, so the historical protection provided by fees cannot be quantified from those measures.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile pair because both assets can move sharply and liquidity may be limited; pool TVL is $21K and the volume-to-TVL ratio is 0.02x. Recent impermanent-loss and range-retention readings are unavailable, so the historical protection provided by fees cannot be quantified from those measures.
For SEIGE-CHUD, consider exiting when price approaches the edge of your range and you cannot monitor or rebalance, when fee income weakens materially, or when pool liquidity begins to drain. A worsening score or a shift away from the current fee-only yield would also warrant reassessment.
For SEIGE-CHUD, consider exiting when price approaches the edge of your range and you cannot monitor or rebalance, when fee income weakens materially, or when pool liquidity begins to drain. A worsening score or a shift away from the current fee-only yield would also warrant reassessment.
There is no reliable break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range retention are unavailable, and the result depends on the future SEIGE-CHUD price path. The fee-only annualized rate is 11.4%, but that figure cannot by itself determine how long fees would take to offset a particular loss.
There is no reliable break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range retention are unavailable, and the result depends on the future SEIGE-CHUD price path. The fee-only annualized rate is 11.4%, but that figure cannot by itself determine how long fees would take to offset a particular loss.
