WealthVille
moon
m
USD1
U

moon-USD1on Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $38.43K
APR
1.3% APR
Fee tier
0.75% fee
Pool address
nkW11QanTPFM · observed 2026-09-06
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100 places this pool in an exit-oriented posture, consistent with the live verdict EXIT. The AI engine reports hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed; the pool ranks 1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, which is weak relative positioning. The assessment could improve through sustained volume growth, deeper and more stable liquidity, and removal of the critical scanner signal; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would worsen it.

Computed 2026-08-06 21:40 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$38.43K

Total value locked

$0.00

24h volume

Yieldhelp

trending_up

1.3%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

0.0%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.75% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 12355m ago0
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleStrong stable income score: 100/100
check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 75/100
tips_and_updates

If entering, use a deliberately bounded range and set an exit or rebalance rule for a material MOON move outside that range; also exit if the scanner's unopposed critical signal persists or pool liquidity begins draining.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.0%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
0.0%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 2.9x)
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 moon-USD1 pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1 of 61707 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1 of 107256

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the moon-USD1 liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing MOON and USD1 into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more heavily weighted toward one asset, and low trading activity means the stated return may not compensate for that risk.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 1.2% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 99% means the stated return depends on trading fees rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established, so any emission decay or incentive change should be treated as an additional uncertainty rather than a predictable income schedule.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range coverage are not reported, so neither realized divergence loss nor range efficiency can be quantified from the available record. As a MEMECOIN pool, MOON-USD1 carries sharp price-move risk, possible liquidity deterioration, emission decay, and exit-timing risk when attention or incentives fade.

tollmoon Context

MOON is the volatile memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement is the principal source of inventory divergence for the LP. Comparative liquidity depth for MOON elsewhere is not established here; a thin external market can make exits more price-sensitive and can amplify the difference between holding MOON and providing liquidity.

tollUSD1 Context

USD1 is the dollar-denominated side of the pair and is intended to provide the accounting reference against which MOON moves. Its usefulness to this LP depends on maintaining that reference and on sufficient pool liquidity; MOON appreciation or depreciation changes the LP's asset mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding the two assets.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing MOON and USD1 into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more heavily weighted toward one asset, and low trading activity means the stated return may not compensate for that risk.

token

Token Details

moon
moonto the moonSolana
Explorer

to the moon (moon) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

USD1
USD1World Liberty Financial USDSolana
Explorer

World Liberty Financial USD (USD1) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
nkW11QanofdyNj921krusBwsDLK5Hu6yWJa2ndnTPFM
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
moon (MwzZZYSx…)
Token B
USD1 (USD1ttGY…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 1.2% and total APR is 1.3%. Because reward duration and dependency are not established, future emission decay cannot be assigned a reliable schedule; the fee-funded portion remains the more concrete source of yield.

The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 1.2% and total APR is 1.3%. Because reward duration and dependency are not established, future emission decay cannot be assigned a reliable schedule; the fee-funded portion remains the more concrete source of yield.

The reward component would fall away or remain absent, leaving trading fees as the principal yield source. With 99% of yield already attributed to fees and 0.00x turnover, the remaining return would depend on whether volume increases or liquidity contracts.

The reward component would fall away or remain absent, leaving trading fees as the principal yield source. With 99% of yield already attributed to fees and 0.00x turnover, the remaining return would depend on whether volume increases or liquidity contracts.

Risk is elevated because MOON can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established, and recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage data are unavailable. Low activity relative to liquidity also limits the fee cushion, with total APR at 1.3%.

Risk is elevated because MOON can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established, and recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage data are unavailable. Low activity relative to liquidity also limits the fee cushion, with total APR at 1.3%.

For this pool, an exit is reasonable when the unopposed critical scanner signal persists, MOON leaves the chosen range, or TVL drains without a corresponding recovery in volume. The live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for incentives that are not established as durable adds timing risk.

For this pool, an exit is reasonable when the unopposed critical scanner signal persists, MOON leaves the chosen range, or TVL drains without a corresponding recovery in volume. The live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for incentives that are not established as durable adds timing risk.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and 0.00x turnover provides little evidence of fee recovery capacity. The relevant comparison is whether future fee income at 1.2% can offset divergence losses before the position is exited.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and 0.00x turnover provides little evidence of fee recovery capacity. The relevant comparison is whether future fee income at 1.2% can offset divergence losses before the position is exited.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights