new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That result is consistent with ai_engine=hold but scanner=CRITICAL, with the strong EXIT signal marked unopposed. The pool ranks #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, so it is not being treated as a leading venue within the tracked set. The assessment would improve only if trading volume and TVL became more durable, the scanner risk changed, and fee income remained measurable; a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce the exit view.
Computed 2026-11-11 17:05 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$51.81K
Total value locked
$118.90
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -28.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, set a precommitted exit trigger for a sustained deterioration below the current 0.00x or a material TVL decline, and review the position whenever WAR leaves the chosen price range; do not rely on the stated APR alone.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $118.90 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.30 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USD1-WAR pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13810 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19946 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USD1-WAR liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USD1 and WAR into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but WAR's price can move sharply and leave you with less value than holding the two tokens separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 0.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with fee sustainability of 100%. Rewards are not currently contributing to the stated APR, and the reward schedule and remaining duration are not established, so emission decay cannot be assigned a reliable timetable. The fee rate is dependent on continued volume, while current volume is $119 against $52K of liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, USD1-WAR carries asymmetric price and liquidity risk if WAR reprices sharply or trading support disappears. Emission status is also uncertain, so an LP should treat exit timing as important rather than assuming fee income will persist.
tollUSD1 Context
USD1 is the stable-value side of this pair and normally provides the reference asset against which WAR volatility is measured. The supplied pool data does not establish USD1's liquidity depth elsewhere, but a move in USD1's market price or a loss of its stable-value behavior would change the pool's balance and the LP's exposure.
tollWAR Context
WAR is the memecoin side of the pair and is the principal source of directional and liquidity risk for this LP. A sharp WAR move can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding the two assets, while a thin external market can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USD1 and WAR into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but WAR's price can move sharply and leave you with less value than holding the two tokens separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- qNAGLPKnYzNtf5iJHdki9Prgodgra5BnadACgecdsjw
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- USD1 (USD1ttGY…)
- Token B
- WAR (8opvqaWy…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 0.3% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the stated APR is not presently supported by reward emissions. Because the reward schedule is not established, future emission decay cannot be timed, but any reward reduction would make the total APR depend even more on $119 and 100%.
The pool currently shows 0.3% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the stated APR is not presently supported by reward emissions. Because the reward schedule is not established, future emission decay cannot be timed, but any reward reduction would make the total APR depend even more on $119 and 100%.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the remaining source of return. For USD1-WAR, that means the APR would converge toward 0.3% unless trading volume changes, while the pool would retain its MEMECOIN price and liquidity risks.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the remaining source of return. For USD1-WAR, that means the APR would converge toward 0.3% unless trading volume changes, while the pool would retain its MEMECOIN price and liquidity risks.
The main risks are WAR price volatility, impermanent loss, and insufficient liquidity for an orderly exit. USD1 may reduce one side's volatility, but it does not remove the risk created by WAR or the pool's $52K liquidity and 0.00x activity profile.
The main risks are WAR price volatility, impermanent loss, and insufficient liquidity for an orderly exit. USD1 may reduce one side's volatility, but it does not remove the risk created by WAR or the pool's $52K liquidity and 0.00x activity profile.
For USD1-WAR, a precommitted exit is reasonable if TVL falls materially, volume weakens below the current 0.00x, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or WAR leaves the selected range and fee income no longer compensates for the exposure. The current live verdict is EXIT.
For USD1-WAR, a precommitted exit is reasonable if TVL falls materially, volume weakens below the current 0.00x, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or WAR leaves the selected range and fee income no longer compensates for the exposure. The current live verdict is EXIT.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. An LP would need realized fees near 0.3% to persist long enough to offset the actual loss from WAR's price movement; the quoted 0.3% is not a guarantee.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. An LP would need realized fees near 0.3% to persist long enough to offset the actual loss from WAR's price movement; the quoted 0.3% is not a guarantee.
