new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter score of 15/100 and Hold score of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT because ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively weak position within the tracked set, not a standalone safety assessment. The view would worsen with a TVL drain, weaker volume, or yield collapse, and would need materially stronger liquidity, sustained fee generation, and removal of the critical scanner signal to change.
Computed 2026-09-17 23:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$58.07K
Total value locked
$31.81
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined active range around the current price, and rebalance or exit when price leaves that range or when the scanner remains CRITICAL; the unopposed EXIT signal is a concrete reason not to wait for a higher displayed APR.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $31.81 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.08 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USD1-WAR pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 69219 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USD1-WAR liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USD1 and WAR into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool to swap between the assets, and you receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with more of the asset that has fallen and lose value if WAR moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so current returns depend on actual swap activity rather than farm emissions. Reward dependency and any emission schedule are not established, making future reward contribution uncertain.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss results and time spent in the active tick range are not established, so the available data cannot show whether fees have offset price divergence. As a MEMECOIN pool, WAR can experience abrupt repricing, shallow exit liquidity, and rapid changes in fee generation. Emissions may decay or cease if incentives are introduced, so exit timing should be based on liquidity, trading activity, and the pool's risk signals rather than headline APR.
tollUSD1 Context
USD1 functions as the dollar-oriented side of this pair, giving the LP exposure to WAR relative to a nominally stable asset. USD1 liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here; any USD1 deviation from its intended value changes the pair's effective exposure and can add impermanent loss.
tollWAR Context
WAR is the memecoin side of the pair and is the primary source of directional and liquidity risk. A sharp WAR move can move the position out of its active range or leave the LP holding proportionally more of the weaker asset, while thin external liquidity can make exits more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USD1 and WAR into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool to swap between the assets, and you receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with more of the asset that has fallen and lose value if WAR moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- qNAGLPKnYzNtf5iJHdki9Prgodgra5BnadACgecdsjw
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- USD1 (USD1ttGY…)
- Token B
- WAR (8opvqaWy…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
194%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed APR is currently driven by the fee-only APR of 0.0%. If incentives are added or reduced, emission decay would lower the reward component without changing fee income unless trading activity also changes.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed APR is currently driven by the fee-only APR of 0.0%. If incentives are added or reduced, emission decay would lower the reward component without changing fee income unless trading activity also changes.
With reward-only APR at 0.0%, expiration would not remove the current reward contribution, but future APR would still depend on trading fees of 0.0%. Lower incentives could also reduce deposits and liquidity, increasing execution and exit risk.
With reward-only APR at 0.0%, expiration would not remove the current reward contribution, but future APR would still depend on trading fees of 0.0%. Lower incentives could also reduce deposits and liquidity, increasing execution and exit risk.
Risk is elevated because WAR can reprice quickly and external liquidity is not established here. The pool has TVL of $58K, volume-to-liquidity of 0.00x, and a live verdict of EXIT, so fee income should not be treated as protection against token or liquidity losses.
Risk is elevated because WAR can reprice quickly and external liquidity is not established here. The pool has TVL of $58K, volume-to-liquidity of 0.00x, and a live verdict of EXIT, so fee income should not be treated as protection against token or liquidity losses.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed EXIT signal persists, TVL drains, or trading activity weakens materially. Leaving the active price range is also a practical trigger because it can reduce fee generation and concentrate the position in one asset.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed EXIT signal persists, TVL drains, or trading activity weakens materially. Leaving the active price range is also a practical trigger because it can reduce fee generation and concentrate the position in one asset.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss results and range history are not established. At the current fee-only APR of 0.0%, break-even depends on how much WAR moves and whether fee volume remains sufficient to offset that divergence.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss results and range history are not established. At the current fee-only APR of 0.0%, break-even depends on how much WAR moves and whether fee volume remains sufficient to offset that divergence.
