new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 43/100, with Enter at 38/100, Hold at 50/100, and Exit at 31/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #201 of 889 meteora-damm-v2 pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish that its fee rate will persist, particularly because the result is driven by trading fees rather than rewards. The assessment would change if TVL drained, 0.93x fell materially, fee APR collapsed, or sustained PURPS volatility produced unfavorable LP inventory; improving and persistent fee volume with stable liquidity would support a stronger assessment.
Computed 2026-09-04 07:10 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$29.35K
Total value locked
$27.43K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 463.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set alerts for a sharp decline in 0.93x, a TVL drain, or a collapse in 500.0%; exit rather than widening the range when those signals coincide with PURPS remaining outside your active price range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $27.43K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $420.64 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 PURPS-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#172 of 1837 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3206 of 105013
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PURPS-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PURPS and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large PURPS price move can leave you holding more of the weaker-performing asset than if you had simply held both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 500.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from fees, and no time-bound reward period is established in the supplied data. This makes the APR sensitive to volume, pool liquidity, fee configuration, and PURPS-SOL price activity; it should not be treated as an emissions-backed rate.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range coverage are not reported, so recent mark-to-market loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, PURPS can move sharply against SOL, leaving the LP with a changing inventory mix and making exit timing important before liquidity becomes one-sided. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the displayed reward component is zero; the larger risks are volume contraction, fee-yield collapse, and rapid PURPS repricing.
tollPURPS Context
PURPS is the memecoin exposure in this pair, so providing liquidity means continuously quoting PURPS against SOL rather than simply holding a fixed PURPS balance. PURPS liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp PURPS move can therefore change the LP's inventory and create losses relative to holding the tokens separately.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the paired asset and the reference side against which PURPS price movement is measured. SOL's broader market liquidity does not remove this pool's risks: if PURPS falls or rises sharply versus SOL, the AMM rebalances the position toward the weaker-performing asset, while SOL price changes also affect the dollar value of both inventory and fees.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PURPS and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large PURPS price move can leave you holding more of the weaker-performing asset than if you had simply held both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- zgLSYJkWC8yU9JvjFRXMD7MjzqY7SebmSAa3REsqaBF
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- PURPS (purpFPo5…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 8/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
7%
APR
4%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay has no current reward contribution to remove from the displayed rate because reward APR is 0.0%. The displayed total APR of 500.0% is derived from 500.0%, so volume and fee generation are the immediate drivers.
Emission decay has no current reward contribution to remove from the displayed rate because reward APR is 0.0%. The displayed total APR of 500.0% is derived from 500.0%, so volume and fee generation are the immediate drivers.
The supplied figures show reward APR at 0.0%, so expiration of farm incentives would not reduce the current displayed yield through a reward component. Fee income would remain dependent on trading activity, and the total APR would fall if that activity or liquidity declined.
The supplied figures show reward APR at 0.0%, so expiration of farm incentives would not reduce the current displayed yield through a reward component. Fee income would remain dependent on trading activity, and the total APR would fall if that activity or liquidity declined.
Risk is high relative to a stable pair because PURPS can move sharply against SOL, changing the LP's inventory and creating impermanent loss. Seven-day loss history and tick-range coverage are not reported, so the available data cannot quantify recent loss or how consistently the position was active.
Risk is high relative to a stable pair because PURPS can move sharply against SOL, changing the LP's inventory and creating impermanent loss. Seven-day loss history and tick-range coverage are not reported, so the available data cannot quantify recent loss or how consistently the position was active.
For PURPS-SOL, consider exiting when 0.93x or 500.0% drops sharply, TVL drains, or PURPS remains outside your selected range. These signals indicate that fee compensation may no longer justify continued exposure to one-sided inventory and memecoin price risk.
For PURPS-SOL, consider exiting when 0.93x or 500.0% drops sharply, TVL drains, or PURPS remains outside your selected range. These signals indicate that fee compensation may no longer justify continued exposure to one-sided inventory and memecoin price risk.
It cannot be estimated reliably without reported seven-day impermanent-loss history, range coverage, and the path of PURPS versus SOL. Break-even requires cumulative fees from 500.0% to exceed the position's mark-to-market loss relative to holding the tokens, and the displayed 500.0% should not be assumed to guarantee that outcome.
It cannot be estimated reliably without reported seven-day impermanent-loss history, range coverage, and the path of PURPS versus SOL. Break-even requires cumulative fees from 500.0% to exceed the position's mark-to-market loss relative to holding the tokens, and the displayed 500.0% should not be assumed to guarantee that outcome.
