Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 13/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 11/100, and Exit at 93/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the pool ranks #107 of 1435 meteora-damm-v2 pools. That combination indicates a pool assessed as suitable to monitor or hold under current conditions, but not as a top-ranked entry: the score reflects fee-supported activity without reward dependence, while memecoin and range risks limit conviction. The assessment would change if $7K fell materially, fee-driven yield collapsed, trading volume migrated away, or price divergence produced unfavorable inventory concentration; sustained liquidity and fee flow could improve it.
Computed 2026-11-06 08:03 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$7.33K
Total value locked
$16.24K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1286.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: withdraw if rolling fee flow causes the realized fee rate to fall materially below 500.0%, or if pool liquidity begins draining from $7K; use a narrower active range only when you can monitor FLAME and EMBER prices and rebalance after a material move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $16.24K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $262.39 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 FLAME-EMBER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#110 of 2558 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2088 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the FLAME-EMBER liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing FLAME and EMBER into the pool so other traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but if either token moves sharply or loses liquidity, you may withdraw with a different mix of tokens and a lower dollar value than if you had simply held them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 500.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of the yield is therefore sourced from trading fees, while no current reward contribution is reflected. Because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool, fee APR can fall quickly if speculative volume migrates elsewhere; future emissions, if introduced, would also be subject to emission decay rather than providing a permanent yield floor.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available in the supplied metrics, and current seven-day tick-range coverage is also unreported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from this data. The main family-specific risk is memecoin price discontinuity: FLAME and EMBER can reprice sharply or lose liquidity, forcing the LP to hold an increasingly imbalanced inventory. Since the pool currently has no reward APR, exit timing should be based on falling fee flow, widening execution conditions, or a material liquidity drain rather than waiting for emissions to end.
tollFLAME Context
FLAME is one side of the pool, but the supplied metrics do not establish its liquidity depth across other Solana venues. A sharp FLAME move relative to EMBER changes the pool's inventory mix through arbitrage and can leave the LP with more of the falling asset, while generating fees only if trading remains active.
tollEMBER Context
EMBER is the other pool asset, and its broader venue liquidity is not established by the available data. If EMBER loses price support or external liquidity, the pool can experience rapid inventory skew and poorer exit conditions; a relative price move can also create impermanent loss even when swap volume remains high.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing FLAME and EMBER into the pool so other traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but if either token moves sharply or loses liquidity, you may withdraw with a different mix of tokens and a lower dollar value than if you had simply held them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 23B6d3FvDu2eiZxyBLgWdm2W2vn1bdRwJTR6NCfQpxGE
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- FLAME (9oXA1VWK…)
- Token B
- EMBER (5dvXTZ5q…)
- Created
- 9/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
21%
APR
20%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 500.0% is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time while 500.0% would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 500.0% is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time while 500.0% would still depend on trading volume.
There is no current reward APR reflected in the pool, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream. The remaining yield would be fee-based, currently represented by 500.0% and supported by 100% of yield from trading fees, but it could decline if volume falls.
There is no current reward APR reflected in the pool, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream. The remaining yield would be fee-based, currently represented by 500.0% and supported by 100% of yield from trading fees, but it could decline if volume falls.
Risk is high in kind because FLAME and EMBER can experience abrupt price changes, liquidity loss, and inventory imbalance. The pool has $7K and 2.21x turnover, but seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history is not available to quantify recent behavior.
Risk is high in kind because FLAME and EMBER can experience abrupt price changes, liquidity loss, and inventory imbalance. The pool has $7K and 2.21x turnover, but seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history is not available to quantify recent behavior.
For this pool, consider exiting when fee flow no longer justifies exposure, when $7K is draining, or when either token develops a sustained one-way move that pushes the position out of its intended range. Do not wait for reward expiry as the primary signal because current reward APR is 0.0%.
For this pool, consider exiting when fee flow no longer justifies exposure, when $7K is draining, or when either token develops a sustained one-way move that pushes the position out of its intended range. Do not wait for reward expiry as the primary signal because current reward APR is 0.0%.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable, and fee realization changes with volume. The relevant offset is the fee stream represented by 500.0%; recovery requires cumulative fees to exceed the position's price-divergence loss and any withdrawal or execution costs.
No fixed break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable, and fee realization changes with volume. The relevant offset is the fee stream represented by 500.0%; recovery requires cumulative fees to exceed the position's price-divergence loss and any withdrawal or execution costs.
