WealthVille
SOL
S
NUMMUS
N

SOL-NUMMUSon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $80.92K
APR
0.6% APR
24h Volume
$410.55 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
AuQtgm4tSBQg · observed 2026-07-29
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

A Wealthville Score of 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, Exit 80/100, and live verdict EXIT, places this pool in an avoid posture despite its #602 of 2403 rank among raydium-amm pools. The combination of high risk, represented by 76/100, and weak yield means the current fee stream does not compensate for memecoin volatility and uncertain exit conditions. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume relative to liquidity, stronger fee generation, and evidence that TVL and market depth are stable; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or worsening NUMMUS liquidity would make it weaker.

Computed 2026-07-29 06:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$80.92K

Total value locked

$410.55

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

1.1%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 749m agoTVL 0.0%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 76/100
tips_and_updates

Use a narrow active range only if you can monitor it, and set an exit trigger when 0.01x falls materially from its current reading for two consecutive days; do not widen the range to preserve exposure if NUMMUS liquidity is deteriorating.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.6%
Fee APR0.6%
Volume$410.55
Fees Earned$1.03

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
1.1%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.1%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
1.1%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.01x(protocol avg 5.1x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 SOL-NUMMUS pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#15235 of 41916 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 26% of all Solana pools

overall rank #19437 of 76620

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-NUMMUS liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing both SOL and NUMMUS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of your tokens can change as prices move, and withdrawing may be difficult if NUMMUS activity falls.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield consists of 0.6% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield sustained by fees. The pool's lifecycle and reward schedule are not established, so emission decay and any future reward changes cannot be modeled reliably. At the current activity level, fee generation is the material source of return.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range occupancy are not reported, so realized price divergence and range efficiency cannot be assessed from those measures. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-NUMMUS carries token-specific volatility, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; emission decay can remove any temporary incentive, while a decline in trading activity can leave fee income insufficient for the risk. The pool's high risk score of 76/100 reinforces the need for active monitoring rather than passive holding.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana venues. For this LP, a sharp SOL move against NUMMUS changes the inventory mix and can increase divergence loss even if SOL itself remains readily tradable elsewhere. SOL price strength can therefore leave the LP holding relatively more NUMMUS after rebalancing.

tollNUMMUS Context

NUMMUS is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to determine the pair's liquidity and exit conditions more than SOL. Its price action, market depth, and holder demand directly affect whether LP shares can be withdrawn near the displayed valuation. A sustained NUMMUS decline or widening market spreads can make fee income inadequate compensation for inventory risk.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing both SOL and NUMMUS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and value of your tokens can change as prices move, and withdrawing may be difficult if NUMMUS activity falls.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

NUMMUS
NUMMUSNummus AeternitasSolana
Explorer

Nummus Aeternitas (NUMMUS) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
AuQtgm4tzdJSsZNGxrM1F69hxbyvMpNM95496pUuSBQg
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
NUMMUS (9JK2U7aE…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The pool currently shows 0.0% from rewards and 0.6% from fees, so any reward emission decay would mainly affect an already absent or negligible reward component. Fee income would remain dependent on trading activity rather than emissions.

The pool currently shows 0.0% from rewards and 0.6% from fees, so any reward emission decay would mainly affect an already absent or negligible reward component. Fee income would remain dependent on trading activity rather than emissions.

Because the displayed reward contribution is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a material part of the current APR. The remaining return would be the fee component, 0.6%, which depends on volume and liquidity usage.

Because the displayed reward contribution is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a material part of the current APR. The remaining return would be the fee component, 0.6%, which depends on volume and liquidity usage.

Risk is elevated because NUMMUS can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become harder to exit while SOL remains actively traded elsewhere. This pool's risk score is 76/100, and its fee-funded APR of 0.6% may not offset those risks.

Risk is elevated because NUMMUS can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become harder to exit while SOL remains actively traded elsewhere. This pool's risk score is 76/100, and its fee-funded APR of 0.6% may not offset those risks.

For SOL-NUMMUS, consider exiting when 0.01x declines further, NUMMUS liquidity worsens, or the position leaves its usable price range and cannot be actively rebalanced. A sustained TVL decline or lower fee APR is also a reason to reassess rather than wait for emissions.

For SOL-NUMMUS, consider exiting when 0.01x declines further, NUMMUS liquidity worsens, or the position leaves its usable price range and cannot be actively rebalanced. A sustained TVL decline or lower fee APR is also a reason to reassess rather than wait for emissions.

There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and trading volume can change materially. At the current fee-only return of 0.6%, fees would need to persist without a material price divergence or liquidity decline for the position to recover that loss.

There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and trading volume can change materially. At the current fee-only return of 0.6%, fees would need to persist without a material price divergence or liquidity decline for the position to recover that loss.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights