Best Raydium AMM Pools by TVL
Raydium standard AMM pools use the classic constant-product (x*y=k) formula. Your liquidity is spread across all possible prices — no range management, no out-of-range downtime, but also lower capital efficiency than CLMM.
AMM is the right choice for set-and-forget LPs and for very long-tail pairs where setting a meaningful CLMM range is impractical.
Best for: passive LPs, illiquid long-tail pairs, and beginners.
Ranked pools
| # | Pool | Protocol | TVL | APR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Old Slerf-SOL | raydium-amm | $14.58M | 0% |
| 2 | smole-SOL | raydium-amm | $13.92M | 0% |
| 3 | BOME-SOL | raydium-amm | $10.47M | 4% |
| 4 | SOL-USDC | raydium-amm | $9.04M | 16% |
| 5 | MEW-SOL | raydium-amm | $8.8M | 1% |
| 6 | SOL-Fartcoin | raydium-amm | $7.04M | 4% |
| 7 | Daily1%-USDC | raydium-amm | $6.82M | 0% |
| 8 | $NAP-SOL | raydium-amm | $5.26M | 0% |
| 9 | $WIF-SOL | raydium-amm | $4.91M | 3% |
| 10 | LIKE-SOL | raydium-amm | $4.44M | — |
| 11 | SOL-jellyjelly | raydium-amm | $4.18M | 28% |
| 12 | RAY-USDC | raydium-amm | $4M | 5% |
| 13 | SOL-arc | raydium-amm | $3.78M | 4% |
| 14 | SOL-pippin | raydium-amm | $3.6M | 7% |
| 15 | PUNDU-SOL | raydium-amm | $3.51M | 0% |
| 16 | POPCAT-SOL | raydium-amm | $3.4M | 5% |
| 17 | SOL-ALCH | raydium-amm | $3.39M | 4% |
| 18 | SOL-Pnut | raydium-amm | $3.1M | 6% |
| 19 | SOL-Ban | raydium-amm | $2.94M | 29% |
| 20 | RAY-SOL | raydium-amm | $2.79M | 2% |
| 21 | SOL-MOODENG | raydium-amm | $2.58M | 2% |
| 22 | MANEKI-SOL | raydium-amm | $2.23M | 0% |
| 23 | SOL-USELESS | raydium-amm | $2.19M | 27% |
| 24 | SOL-ZEREBRO | raydium-amm | $2.16M | 34% |
| 25 | SOL-VINE | raydium-amm | $1.96M | 8% |
Frequently asked questions
Should I use Raydium AMM or CLMM?
AMM if you want set-and-forget exposure across all prices. CLMM if you're willing to actively manage range — fee yields are 5-20x higher per dollar deployed.
Why is Raydium AMM fee APR lower than CLMM?
Same fee revenue split across far more deployed liquidity. The yield gap is the cost of not managing a concentrated range.
How does impermanent loss differ between AMM and CLMM?
Standard AMM IL is bounded and well-studied (~5.7% for 2x price move). CLMM IL is unbounded relative to range width — tight ranges magnify IL, wider ranges approach AMM behavior.
Explore more on WealthVille
Compare across DEXs
Cross-chain yields